|
Men & Women
Public toilets. Men are
expected to stand shoulder to shoulder with strangers, before unzipping their
trousers, taking out their cocks (in full view of said strangers stood either
side of them), then pee. In front of strangers! Who, it has to be said,
invariably engage them in conversation.
I don't know about you,
but I don't see having a pee as a social event to share with strangers.
Women, on the other hand,
have individual cubicles in which to pee in private.
Women get to pee in
private, whilst men are forced to pee in the gaze of strangers.
In accordance with sexual
equality, I propose women should have one big open room with a row of toilets
so that they can sit shoulder to shoulder with other women (strangers) whilst
they pee.
Surely it's only fair,
under sexual equality legislation?
Women bleat about
equality, so why not let them pee with equality?
Coins
Men don't carry change.
If they do, they don't use it; preferring to pay with notes, thereafter dumping
the coins in a jar when they get home.
Women, on the other hand,
love coins. They can't get enough of them; their capacious purses are full of
them.
At the supermarket
check-out, a man, when presented with a bill for £19.37, will pay with a £20
note; a woman will open her purse and say, "I think I have the right
money." She will then proceed to produce £1, £2, 20p, 5p, £1. "Hang on,
how much have I given you? Is it £6.70? No? Oh dear. Now, how much more do you
need? Oh, here's 10p and a 5p; that's 15p....." For f 's sake,
get on with it."
Driving
Why do women feel the
need to drive with their noses pressed against the windscreen?
Why do women feel the
need to use the hand brake every time they stop at traffic lights; causing a 30
second delay while they struggle to release it when the lights turn green?
Why do women shuffle the
steering wheel through their hands with a motion akin to milking a cow?
Double Standards
If a woman discovers that
her husband/boyfriend has been cheating on her, then proceeds to cut up his
clothes, deliberately crash his beloved car, put laxative in his food, hit him
with a frying pan, or even take a pair of scissors to his cock, it is seemingly
a source of amusement. The newspapers report it as a funny story.
However, if a man
discovers his wife/girlfriend has been cheating on him, then proceeds to throw
her and her possessions out into the street; he's a callous bastard. It's his
fault she had the affair in the first place; he should have told her every day
of every week of every year that he loved her.
If he, in a moment of
despair and distress, slaps her, he is then labelled a wife beater who "should
be locked up" we all shout.
Screening
Women are encouraged, to
the point of compulsion, to use the NHS breast screening service.
They are also encouraged,
once again to the point of compulsion, to use the NHS cervical smear service.
And rightly so. Anything
that can be done to reduce the risk of contracting cancer (I don't even like
saying the word, let alone writing it) is an incredibly good thing.
Men also contract cancer.
However, unlike women, we do not get an NHS prostate cancer screening service.
We do not have a NHS testicular cancer screening service. Men have no NHS
cancer screening service.
Equality? I don't think
so.
Rape
If a woman, after having
drunken or ill-advised consensual sex, goes to the police later that night, or
the following morning, or even three years later, and claims she was raped, the
man will be arrested and locked up in a police cell, pending inquiries. It requires
no more evidence than the woman's accusation.
The woman has anonymity;
the man's name is all over the newspapers; not withstanding there is no
evidence and he has not been convicted by a court.
So if a woman is believed
when she says she has been raped (without evidence), why is a man not believed
when he says she consented?
In the absence of
evidence to support either side, why is the woman believed and the man not?
Maybe it's the one who
goes to the police first who is believed.
If so, all men, after a
drunken one night stand, should go to the police and say, "I've just had
drunken consensual sex with a woman I've just met in a bar, but I didn't rape
her." "OK sir," the police would reply, "if she says otherwise,
we'll arrest her." Ridiculous? Yes, isn't it. However, no more ridiculous
than the existing procedure.
I know this is a
controversial subject and this article is NOT aimed at genuine rape victims.
However, a lot of totally innocent men have their lives ruined by spurious rape
claims by women seeking revenge (for whatever reason), or women who regret
their sexual conduct and are looking for an excuse for their ‘temporary moral
lapse'; a way to regain their sexual integrity.
So why not investigate
the allegation with anonymity for all concerned? Then, if there is evidence,
arrest. Equality for men!
The Final Word
If I hear one more thing
about Jordan and Peter......aggghhhhhh!
 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
